In accordance with a December 26, 2014 article in USA Today entitled “Bowl Game Attendance on Decline But TV Interest Grows,” author Brent Schrotenboer states, “Although ticket demand is relatively low for lesser bowls, watch super bowl 2019 online free keep watching, even though it’s the Camellia Bowl in Montgomery, Ala., a game that drew just 20,256 fans a week ago but attracted the average television audience of 1,114,000, based on ESPN.”
Schrotenboer continues to express, “Only one bowl game this past year drew fewer than 1.2 million viewers on average, based on Nielsen. That’s better compared to the 1.1 million who watched a beginning day baseball game this past year involving the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox. Nationally broadcast regular season baseball games in 2012 and 2013 averaged about 680,000 viewers.”
Could you imagine then the following scenario for the college football bowl season:
ESPN builds its television studio strictly for the goal of hosting college bowl games. The television network already owns and operates 11 bowl games. In that way, it doesn’t have middleman to deal with for these additional events, eliminating needing to negotiate with a separate facility to host the game. No costs for having to drive production trailers or fly technical crews halfway over the country.
Since this facility would be built as a television studio and not as an outdoor multipurpose arena, ESPN might make attending the bowl game a true multimedia experience for the fan, with special effects like lasers. lights and smoke. The network could ensure the bowl experience for the live attendee in addition to the television viewer to be unlike any other.
But here’s the catch: the ESPN studio could have just a limited quantity of seats, say 5,000 or less, which will minimize construction costs. The studio wouldn’t have to be much bigger than the typical college football program’s practice facility. Just big enough to exhibit to the million plus viewers there are actually some fans in the stands. Thus, there wouldn’t be considered a single bad seat in the house. You’d rest assured an up-close and personal bowl experience. And due to the intimate atmosphere, the sounds from the fans would reverberate through the entire facility.
Because of the limited method of getting seats, this would force ticket demand (and prices) up. No longer 60,000- or 80,000-seat facilities which can be less than the usual quarter full. It would be a 180-degree vary from the current experience, by which many schools need certainly to rely on daily deal sites to simply help unload their share of allocated tickets.
Thus, the universities would benefit since they wouldn’t have to buy the tens of thousands of tickets that they cannot sell (even on Groupon).
ESPN could use this facility multiple times throughout the expanse of the two- to three-week bowl period.
For instance, this season five additional college football teams qualified for a bowl that these were not invited to. That’s two additional games that the schools and network are not generating countless dollars from, forcing television viewers to instead watch sitcom reruns when they would much rather be enjoying a live sporting event. And advertisers prefer to be buying time on a television program that a lot of viewers will watch live and can’t fast-forward through their commercials.